Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Hostal Neptuno

Avda. de Alemania n 19(bajo), 10005 Cáceres, Extremadura, Spain
+34 927 236 423

£22+

Overall guest ratings

7.0/10 Good
Based on 902 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.8
  • 8.4
  • 4.6
  • 3.6

Good to know

  • Near city centre

Nearby

    show all

    Amenities

    • Internet
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 902 reviews
    • 8.8 "Great service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.0 "90% thought the service was very professional."
      10.0 "Management was excellent, said 100%."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      8.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 85%."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
      8.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 86%."
      8.3 "83% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.0 "Near to public transport, according to 80%."
    • 6.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.3 "Internet is average."
      5.0 "50% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 5.2 "Average cleanliness."
    • 4.6 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.4 "66% thought it was too noisy."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.9 "71% found problems with the furniture."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      2.6 "74% had problems with the shower."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the architecture."
    • 1.3 "Horrible vibe."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      2.5 "75% criticized the plain hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 523 reviews
    • 8.8 "Great service."
      9.8 "98% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      8.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 86%."
      7.5 "Great parking, according to 75%."
    • 6.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.2 "Internet is average."
    • 5.4 "Average cleanliness."
    • 4.7 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% thought it was too noisy."
      2.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 77%."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "For 99%, the rooms looked old."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.8 "72% found problems with the furniture."
      2.9 "71% had problems with the shower."
      2.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 77%."
      5.0 "Only 50% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.3 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 261 reviews
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
    • 8.7 "Great service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.0 "90% thought the service was very professional."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
      8.4 "City centre within easy reach, said 84%."
    • 5.4 "Average cleanliness."
    • 4.5 "Not very comfortable."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.5 "65% thought it was too noisy."
      2.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 77%."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      3.4 "66% found problems with the furniture."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      2.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 77%."
      2.4 "76% had problems with the shower."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 117 reviews
    • 9.0 "Excellent value."
    • 8.8 "Great service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
    • 6.2 "Internet is average."
    • 5.0 "Average comfort."
      4.9 "51% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.9 "51% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% found problems with the furniture."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Near city centre"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Map

    Map

    Close