Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Jing An Hotel

370 Huashan Road, Shanghai 200040, China
+86 216 248 0088

£57+

Overall guest ratings

8.0/10 Good
Based on 4,396 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.5
  • 9.2
  • 4.8
  • 4.5

Good to know

  • Good accessibility by car

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Jin Jiang Jing An Hotel puts you within a 10-minute drive of Jing An Temple and French Concession. Guests can indulge in massages, and The Madrid restaurant, one of 2 restaurants, serves breakfast, lunch, and dinner. A bar/lounge and a health club are other highlights, and rooms at this upscale hotel offer LCD TVs and minibars.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Wi-Fi
    • Fitness centre
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Car hire
    • Babysitting or child care
    • Business centre
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Gift shop
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Beauty salon
    • Express check out
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Sauna
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Concierge service
    • No smoking
    • Coffee shop
    • Internet (surcharge)
    • Pets not allowed
    • Storage available
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    8.0 Good
    Based on 4,396 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      8.8 "Near to public transport, according to 88%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 9.2 "Incredible bar."
    • 6.5 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "Only 56% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.0 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 78%."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      1.4 "86% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.8 "82% found problems with the furniture."
      2.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 78%."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.8 "62% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.9 "81% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.2 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.2 "For 68%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
      3.2 "For 68%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 1.4 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.7 "93% thought it was overpriced."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.5 Good
    Based on 131 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
    • 4.6 "Not very comfortable."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall rating

    8.3 Excellent
    Based on 791 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      8.9 "Near to public transport, according to 89%."
    • 6.5 "Service is ok."
      5.7 "Only 57% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.6 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
    • 4.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.5 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.9 "91% thought it was overpriced."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.1 Excellent
    Based on 3,077 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      8.8 "Near to public transport, according to 88%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 6.2 "Service is ok."
      5.5 "Only 55% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.1 "Average comfort."
      5.7 "For only 57%, the noise level was all right."
      5.2 "Beds were acceptable for 52%."
    • 4.9 "Breakfast is below average."
      4.0 "60% said the breakfast was too expensive."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were small."
      0.1 "For 99%, the rooms looked old."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      1.5 "85% found problems with the furniture."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.3 "87% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.8 "62% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.5 "95% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.1 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.6 "94% thought it was overpriced."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.7 Good
    Based on 395 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      9.0 "Near to public transport, according to 90%."
    • 6.4 "Service is ok."
      5.9 "Only 59% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 4.1 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.8 "92% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.6 "94% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Good accessibility by car"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map