Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Première Classe Valence Sud

59 ave des Aureats, 26000 Valence (Drôme), Rhône-Alpes, France
+33 8 92 70 72 54

£27+

Overall guest ratings

6.9/10 Good
Based on 1,069 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.4
  • 4.9
  • 4.0
  • 4.0

Good to know

  • Comfortable beds
  • Good accessibility by car

Nearby

    show all

    About

    When you stay at Première Classe Valence Sud, you'll be within a 15-minute drive of Maison des Tetes. You'll have free perks like WiFi and self parking. There's also a terrace, and rooms offer flat-screen TVs and premium bedding.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Air-conditioned
    • Free parking
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Room service
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Beauty salon
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 1,069 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      8.0 "Great parking, according to 80%."
      10.0 "100% thought parking was inexpensive."
    • 8.3 "Great service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.7 "97% said the reception staff was great."
      9.2 "92% thought the service was very professional."
    • 4.9 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      3.8 "62% thought it was too noisy."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
    • 4.0 "Disappointing food."
      1.1 "89% did not enjoy the desserts."
      1.7 "83% found the side dishes unedible."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.8 "62% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      1.0 "90% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.6 "84% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.3 "97% had problems with the shower."
      1.6 "For 84%, the rooms looked old."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
      1.9 "81% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 374 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      8.3 "Great parking, according to 83%."
    • 8.6 "Great service."
      9.7 "97% said the reception staff was great."
      9.8 "98% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 5.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
      3.9 "61% thought it was too noisy."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
      0.9 "91% complained about the bathroom."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were dirty."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.2 "98% had problems with the shower."
      1.4 "86% found problems with the furniture."
      1.9 "For 81%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.8 "Horrible vibe."
      1.8 "82% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 555 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      8.0 "Great parking, according to 80%."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      9.5 "95% said the reception staff was great."
      9.8 "98% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.0 "90% thought the service was very professional."
    • 4.9 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.7 "Not very comfortable."
      0.6 "94% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.7 "63% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.6 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      2.6 "74% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      0.6 "94% said rooms were small."
      1.1 "89% complained about the bathroom."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.4 "96% had problems with the shower."
      1.5 "For 85%, the rooms looked old."
      1.5 "85% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.6 "74% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 10 reviews
    • 8.0 "Great service."

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 128 reviews
    • 8.3 "Location is great."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.8 "98% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.5 "95% said the reception staff was great."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      4.4 "56% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      0.8 "92% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "98% had problems with the shower."
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to know
    "Comfortable beds"
    "Good accessibility by car"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    More
    Photos
    Map

    Map