Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

JS Tower Service Apartment

393-11 Soi Sawaddee 4, Sukhumvit 50, Banjak, Prakhanong, Bangkok, Thailand
+66 2 742 9100

£11+

Overall guest ratings

6.2/10 Good
Based on 695 reviews

Review highlights

  • 7.9
  • 7.3
  • 4.6
  • 3.8

Nearby

    show all

    About

    JS Tower Service Apartment puts you within a 15-minute drive of Suan Pakkard Palace and Patpong Night Market. For a bite to eat, guests can check out Ruski Restaurant, which serves Thai cuisine and is open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. There's also a garden, and apartments offer deep soaking tubs and refrigerators.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Room service
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Free parking
    • Storage available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Laundry service
    • Tennis
    • Coffee shop
    • Business centre
    • Pets not allowed
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    6.2 Good
    Based on 695 reviews
    • 7.9 "High comfort."
      9.1 "91% thought rooms were spacious."
      7.6 "76% thought it was pleasantly quiet."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.2 "82% thought the service was very professional."
    • 5.2 "Rooms are ok."
      6.6 "Beds were acceptable for 66%."
    • 5.2 "Location is acceptable."
      6.7 "For 67%, the distance to the train station was ok."
      5.0 "Proximity to public transport was ok, according to 50%."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Not very clean."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      1.8 "82% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.5 "65% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.3 "57% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 1.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.0 OK
    Based on 333 reviews
    • 7.7 "High comfort."
      9.1 "91% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      8.6 "86% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.0 "80% thought the service was very professional."
    • 5.1 "Rooms are ok."
      6.5 "Beds were acceptable for 65%."
    • 5.1 "Location is acceptable."
      6.9 "For 69%, the distance to the train station was ok."
      5.2 "Proximity to public transport was ok, according to 52%."
    • 4.5 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.2 "Internet is poor."
      3.2 "68% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.5 "Not very clean."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      3.2 "68% thought it was rather dirty."
      1.8 "82% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.6 "Terrible amenities."
      2.2 "78% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    Based on 139 reviews
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
    • 8.1 "Comfort level is high."
      9.2 "92% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      8.7 "87% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 5.5 "Rooms are ok."
    • 5.0 "Location is acceptable."
    • 4.8 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.6 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    Based on 222 reviews
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
    • 7.7 "High comfort."
      9.2 "92% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      8.2 "82% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 5.2 "Rooms are ok."
      6.5 "Beds were acceptable for 65%."
    • 4.8 "Inconvenient location."
      4.2 "Difficult to access by car, said 58%."
      0.0 "Distant to city centre, said 100%."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou
    Photos
    Map

    Map