Ibis Budget Paris Porte de Pantin, Pantin Hotels from £37

Guest reviews

Based on 1,362 reviews

Location

7.7 "Good location."

9.7 "Near to public transport, according to 97%."

10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."

9.3 "93% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."

10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
Service

7.5 "Good service."

8.8 "88% found the staff to be very friendly."

7.6 "76% said the reception staff was great."

7.6 "76% thought the service was very professional."
Breakfast

6.9 "Breakfast is mediocre."

5.4 "Breakfast prices were ok, according to 54%."
Cleanliness

5.4 "Average cleanliness."

5.2 "Only 52% said rooms were clean enough."

6.0 "60% thought the cleanliness of the hotel was average."
WiFi

5.2 "Internet is average."
Comfort

5.1 "Average comfort."

5.5 "Beds were acceptable for 55%."
Room

3.9 "Rooms are not good."

1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."

0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."

1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."

3.4 "66% had problems with the shower."

1.1 "89% said the bathroom was dirty."

2.8 "72% found problems with the furniture."

3.7 "63% criticized the small bathroom."

2.2 "78% were disappointed with the minibar."

4.1 "For 59%, the rooms looked old."

View all review categories

Based on 394 reviews

Location

7.6 "Good location."

9.6 "Near to public transport, according to 96%."
Service

7.5 "Good service."

8.7 "87% found the staff to be very friendly."

7.6 "76% said the reception staff was great."

7.7 "77% thought the service was very professional."
Breakfast

7.0 "Good breakfast."
Cleanliness

5.2 "Average cleanliness."

5.3 "Only 53% said rooms were clean enough."
Room

3.9 "Rooms are not good."

1.5 "85% complained about the bathroom."

2.9 "71% found problems with the furniture."

1.2 "88% said the bathroom was dirty."

0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."

3.2 "68% had problems with the shower."

4.1 "For 59%, the rooms looked old."
Amenities

2.4 "Terrible amenities."

2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."

Based on 585 reviews

Service

7.5 "Good service."

8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."

7.4 "74% said the reception staff was great."

7.3 "73% thought the service was very professional."
Location

7.4 "Good location."

9.6 "Near to public transport, according to 96%."
Breakfast

7.2 "Good breakfast."
Cleanliness

5.4 "Average cleanliness."

5.0 "Only 50% said rooms were clean enough."

6.1 "61% thought the cleanliness of the hotel was average."
Comfort

4.7 "Not very comfortable."

1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."

4.3 "57% thought it was too noisy."
Room

3.4 "Rooms are not good."

1.4 "86% complained about the bathroom."

0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."

1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."

3.4 "66% had problems with the shower."

2.5 "75% found problems with the furniture."

1.0 "90% said the bathroom was dirty."
Amenities

2.7 "Terrible amenities."

2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."

View all review categories

Based on 381 reviews

Service

7.7 "Good service."

8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."

7.7 "77% said the reception staff was great."

8.0 "80% thought the service was very professional."
Location

7.6 "Good location."

9.7 "Near to public transport, according to 97%."
Breakfast

6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Cleanliness

5.7 "Average cleanliness."

5.5 "Only 55% said rooms were clean enough."
Comfort

5.3 "Average comfort."
Room

4.1 "Rooms are not good."

1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."

0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."

1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."

3.1 "69% had problems with the shower."