Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Ih Hotels Milano Lorenteggio

Via Lorenteggio 278, 20152 Milan, Lombardy, Italy
+39 0241 3111

£54+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
Based on 2,942 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.1
  • 7.8
  • 4.2
  • 3.8

Nearby

    show all

    About

    When you stay at IH Hotels Milano Lorenteggio, you'll be within a 15-minute drive of Leonardo da Vinci Museum of Science and Technology and San Siro Stadium. You can relax with a drink at the bar/lounge, and the restaurant is the perfect spot to grab a bite to eat. Rooms at this upscale hotel get the details right with nice touches like premium bedding, pillow menus, and down comforters.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • ATM on-site
    • Laundry facilities
    • Cable or satellite TV
    • Babysitting/child care services (surcharge)
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 3,327 reviews
    • 8.1 "Breakfast is good."
      8.9 "89% were happy with the price of the breakfast."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
      7.6 "76% said the reception staff was great."
      7.0 "70% thought the service was very professional."
      8.3 "83% found the restaurant service to be one of the best."
    • 7.1 "Good location."
      7.1 "Great parking, according to 71%."
      9.0 "Near to public transport, according to 90%."
      9.2 "92% thought parking was inexpensive."
      8.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 80%."
      7.3 "73% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 4.2 "Bad amenities."
      4.1 "59% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.0 "70% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the architecture."
      0.8 "92% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the smoking area."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."
      0.6 "94% found problems with the furniture."
      0.9 "For 91%, the rooms looked old."
      1.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 90%."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.6 "84% had problems with the shower."
      3.3 "67% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
      4.9 "51% thought it was overpriced."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.1 "59% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      4.3 "57% criticized the plain hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 1,264 reviews
    • 8.1 "Breakfast is good."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.4 "74% said the reception staff was great."
      7.1 "71% thought the service was very professional."
      8.6 "86% found the restaurant service to be one of the best."
    • 7.3 "Good location."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
      8.8 "Near to public transport, according to 88%."
      9.0 "90% thought parking was inexpensive."
      8.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 80%."
      7.1 "71% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.0 "For 90%, the rooms looked old."
      0.6 "94% found problems with the furniture."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.7 "83% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.0 "Bad amenities."
      4.0 "60% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.0 "70% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.0 "Internet is poor."
      3.4 "66% said the wifi quality was bad."
      5.0 "50% thought it was adequately priced."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.9 "61% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.4 "86% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    Based on 1,397 reviews
    • 8.5 "Breakfast is good."
    • 8.3 "Good value."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.5 "75% said the reception staff was great."
      8.4 "84% found the restaurant service to be one of the best."
    • 6.9 "Location is acceptable."
      6.8 "Parking was ok, according to 68%."
    • 5.3 "Average comfort."
      6.4 "Beds were acceptable for 64%."
    • 4.2 "Bad amenities."
      4.0 "60% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.7 "93% complained about the elevator."
    • 4.0 "Internet is poor."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.5 "85% complained about the bathroom."
      0.6 "94% found problems with the furniture."
      0.8 "For 92%, the rooms looked old."
      1.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 89%."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.4 "86% had problems with the shower."
      4.9 "51% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.8 "52% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.0 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      4.1 "59% thought it was rather dirty."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.5 "Horrible pool."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    Based on 66 reviews
    • 7.9 "Good service."
    • 7.8 "High value."
    • 7.8 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.2 "Good location."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      1.3 "87% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    Based on 598 reviews
    • 7.9 "Good service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.6 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.2 "Good location."
      7.1 "Great parking, according to 71%."
      9.0 "Near to public transport, according to 90%."
      9.3 "93% thought parking was inexpensive."
    • 4.5 "Bad amenities."
      4.5 "55% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.6 "Internet is poor."
      4.6 "54% thought it was overpriced."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% found problems with the furniture."
      0.9 "For 91%, the rooms looked old."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      1.7 "83% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.6 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.9 "61% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 1.9 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    More
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close