Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

First Hotel

Via Dino Ciolli, 5, 50041 Calenzano, Tuscany, Italy
+39 0558 8724

£33+

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
Based on 1,694 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.5
  • 7.4
  • 4.8
  • 4.7

Good to know

  • Good accessibility by car

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located near a train station, First Hotel is a great choice for a stay in Calenzano. The restaurant is the perfect spot for a bite to eat, and after having fun at the outdoor pool, you can unwind with a drink at the bar/lounge. A poolside bar and a seasonal outdoor pool are other highlights, and rooms at this upscale hotel offer up nice touches like Select Comfort beds with Egyptian cotton sheets.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Business centre
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • Gift shop
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • Outdoor pool
    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Beauty salon
    • Express check out
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Free parking
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Child pool
    • Cable or satellite TV
    • Coffee shop
    • Babysitting/child care services (surcharge)
    • Wedding services
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 1,694 reviews
    • 8.5 "Location is great."
      8.3 "Great parking, according to 83%."
      8.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 83%."
      9.5 "95% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.8 "88% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.7 "87% found the restaurant service to be one of the best."
    • 7.2 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.6 "Average cleanliness."
      6.9 "Only 69% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 6.4 "Food is average."
      6.1 "61% thought the dining experience was appropriate."
      6.1 "Only 61% were satisfied with the menu."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      1.5 "85% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.9 "For 61%, the rooms looked old."
      3.1 "69% found problems with the furniture."
      0.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 94%."
      3.1 "69% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.1 "69% had problems with the shower."
      3.2 "68% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.7 "93% were disappointed with the minibar."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.7 "Not very comfortable."
      1.7 "83% thought it was too noisy."
      0.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 94%."
      3.1 "69% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.2 "Bar is not good."
    • 3.9 "Bad amenities."
      4.0 "60% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.0 "90% complained about the elevator."
      2.5 "75% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      2.3 "77% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.5 Good
    Based on 948 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      8.5 "Easily accessible by car, said 85%."
      8.3 "Great parking, according to 83%."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.2 "Housekeeping was great, according to 72%."
    • 7.0 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.7 "Average cleanliness."
    • 6.0 "Food is average."
      6.2 "62% thought the dining experience was appropriate."
      5.8 "Only 58% were satisfied with the menu."
    • 5.3 "Average comfort."
      6.1 "Only 61% said rooms were big enough."
    • 5.1 "Rooms are ok."
      6.1 "Only 61% said rooms were big enough."
    • 3.8 "Bad amenities."
      3.9 "61% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.9 "71% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.3 "77% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.1 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.7 Good
    Based on 203 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      8.5 "Great parking, according to 85%."
    • 7.5 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      8.8 "88% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.1 "High value."
    • 6.3 "Average cleanliness."
      6.7 "Only 67% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 6.3 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.6 "Not very comfortable."
      1.7 "83% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.9 "61% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      2.3 "77% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 50 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      8.8 "88% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.0 "Rooms are ok."
    • 4.6 "Not very comfortable."

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 491 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      8.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 86%."
      8.2 "Great parking, according to 82%."
    • 7.4 "High value."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.5 "Average cleanliness."
      6.8 "Only 68% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.0 "Average comfort."
      1.6 "84% thought it was too noisy."
      0.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 95%."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      3.4 "66% complained about the bathroom."
      1.5 "85% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 95%."
      3.0 "70% found problems with the furniture."
      3.6 "For 64%, the rooms looked old."
    • 4.1 "Bad amenities."
      4.1 "59% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.6 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.8 "Horrible vibe."
      1.9 "81% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to know
    "Good accessibility by car"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    More
    Photos
    Map

    Map