Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Curzon House Hotel

58 Courtfield Gardens, London, SW5 0NF, United Kingdom
+44 207 373 1163

£25+

Overall guest ratings

7.0/10 Good
Based on 1,218 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.8
  • 8.7
  • 4.4
  • 4.3

Good to know

  • Clean bathroom

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Curzon House Hotel - Hostel puts you just a 5-minute drive from Royal Albert Hall and Natural History Museum. Free perks include WiFi and continental breakfast daily between 8 AM and 9:30 AM. Also, Imperial College London and Kensington Palace are within a short drive.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Pets not allowed
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 1,218 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 8.7 "Great service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.5 "75% said the reception staff was great."
    • 6.3 "Internet is average."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      5.0 "For only 50%, the bathroom was ok."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "For 71%, the rooms looked old."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
      4.4 "56% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.0 "70% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.3 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.1 "Horrible vibe."
      2.1 "79% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.5 "85% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      0.0 "For 100%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the architecture."
      0.0 "For 100%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    Based on 414 reviews
    • 9.9 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.8 "Great service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.5 "75% said the reception staff was great."
    • 6.4 "Internet is average."
    • 4.1 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      4.6 "54% complained about the bathroom."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "For 68%, the rooms looked old."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
      4.4 "56% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.5 "65% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.0 "Horrible vibe."
      2.3 "77% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.6 "84% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.1 "59% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 341 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 9.1 "World class service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.9 "79% said the reception staff was great."
    • 6.0 "Internet is average."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
      4.2 "58% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.0 "For 70%, the rooms looked old."
      3.1 "69% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.1 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.0 "Horrible vibe."
      2.1 "79% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 462 reviews
    • 9.9 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.9 "Great service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "77% said the reception staff was great."
    • 6.5 "Internet is average."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.7 "For 73%, the rooms looked old."
      1.8 "82% found problems with the furniture."
      4.3 "57% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 4.5 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.1 "Horrible vibe."
      2.0 "80% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Clean bathroom"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close