Kings De Nathan, Hong Kong Hotels from £57

Guest reviews

All reviews
Couples
Families
Business
Solo

Overall rating

Based on 1,779 reviews

Location

9.7 "Terrific location."

9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."

9.4 "Easily accessible by car, said 94%."

9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."

10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

10.0 "Good access to the airport, said 100%."

10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."

10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."

10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
Food

8.8 "Food is delicious."

10.0 "100% enjoyed the snacks that were offered."

9.0 "90% were happy with the price."
Service

6.4 "Service is ok."

6.4 "Only 64% found the staff to be friendly enough."

5.8 "58% said the reception staff was ok."
WiFi

4.9 "Internet is poor."

4.5 "55% said the wifi quality was bad."
Cleanliness

4.6 "Not very clean."

4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."

2.2 "78% said the bathroom was dirty."
Room

4.4 "Rooms are not good."

4.3 "57% said rooms were small."

4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."

3.8 "62% complained about the bathroom."

3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."

2.2 "78% said the bathroom was dirty."

2.8 "For 72%, the rooms looked old."

3.3 "67% had problems with the shower."

2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."

2.7 "73% thought the tv was sub-standard."

2.7 "73% found problems with the furniture."
Amenities

3.8 "Bad amenities."

3.8 "62% thought the building wasn't nice."

0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."

1.8 "For 82%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."

3.8 "62% thought the facilities needed updating."

View all review categories

Overall rating

Based on 729 reviews

Location

9.6 "Terrific location."

9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."

9.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 93%."

9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."

10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."

10.0 "Good access to the airport, said 100%."
Food

8.8 "Food is delicious."
Service

7.3 "Good service."

7.1 "71% found the staff to be very friendly."

7.1 "Housekeeping was great, according to 71%."
WiFi

5.2 "Internet is average."
Cleanliness

4.2 "Not very clean."

4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."

2.1 "79% said the bathroom was dirty."
Room

4.2 "Rooms are not good."

4.4 "56% said rooms were small."

3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."

3.9 "61% complained about the bathroom."

0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."

3.2 "68% had problems with the shower."

2.5 "For 75%, the rooms looked old."

2.1 "79% said the bathroom was dirty."

2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."

3.0 "70% thought the tv was sub-standard."
Amenities

3.5 "Bad amenities."

3.5 "65% thought the building wasn't nice."

1.0 "90% complained about the elevator."

4.2 "58% thought the facilities needed updating."

View all review categories

Overall rating

Based on 587 reviews

Location

9.8 "Terrific location."

9.4 "Easily accessible by car, said 94%."

9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."

9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
Food

8.9 "Food is delicious."
Value for money

8.7 "Good value."
Service

6.9 "Service is ok."

6.4 "Only 64% found the staff to be friendly enough."

5.4 "54% said the reception staff was ok."
WiFi

4.8 "Internet is poor."

4.4 "56% said the wifi quality was bad."
Cleanliness

4.0 "Not very clean."

3.9 "61% said rooms were dirty."

2.0 "80% said the bathroom was dirty."
Amenities

3.5 "Bad amenities."

3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."

0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
Room

3.4 "Rooms are not good."

3.3 "67% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

3.9 "61% said rooms were dirty."

3.5 "65% complained about the bathroom."

0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."

2.0 "80% said the bathroom was dirty."

2.4 "For 76%, the rooms looked old."

1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."
Comfort

3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."

3.3 "67% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

2.6 "74% thought it was too noisy."

1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."

View all review categories

Overall rating

Based on 177 reviews

Location

9.8 "Terrific location."

9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."

9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."

9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
Value for money

8.3 "Good value."
Service

6.8 "Service is ok."

6.9 "Only 69% found the staff to be friendly enough."
WiFi

5.2 "Internet is average."
Cleanliness

4.6 "Not very clean."

4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
Room

4.1 "Rooms are not good."

3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

4.1 "59% said rooms were small."

3.7 "63% complained about the bathroom."

4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
Amenities

3.6 "Bad amenities."

3.6 "64% thought the building wasn't nice."

1.1 "89% complained about the elevator."

View all review categories

Overall rating

Based on 284 reviews

Location

9.8 "Terrific location."

9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."

9.5 "Easily accessible by car, said 95%."

9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
Food

8.9 "Food is delicious."
Service

6.9 "Service is ok."

7.0 "70% found the staff to be very friendly."

6.2 "62% said the reception staff was ok."
Cleanliness

5.0 "Average cleanliness."

4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
Room

4.7 "Rooms are not good."

4.6 "54% said rooms were small."

4.0 "60% complained about the bathroom."

4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."

3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
WiFi

4.6 "Internet is poor."

4.2 "58% said the wifi quality was bad."
Amenities

3.9 "Bad amenities."

3.8 "62% thought the building wasn't nice."

1.1 "89% complained about the elevator."